blob: 6562e53168e42be4478705f898b51043bb558f50 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
|
14-Oct-2008
Release coverage of dillo-2.0 in Desktop Linux
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS6922044112.html
19-Feb-2004
Linux for Devices coverage of dillo-0.8.0 release.
http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Embeddable-browser-project-hits-milestone-release-seeks-funding/
Jun-2002
Matthias Arndt at Linux Gazette has written an article which introduces Dillo
to possible new users.
http://linuxgazette.net/issue79/arndt.html
15-Sep-2002
Paul Tatham from the Montreal Linux Users Group makes an interesting review
of Dillo.
http://www.mlug.ca/static/35.htm
01-Sep-2002
Marcel Gagne describes how to build a lightweight Linux.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6169
26-Feb-2002
Ralph Krause at Linux Journal has made a review of Dillo 0.6.4.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5847
18-Jan-2003
Freshmeat has an article "Lightweight Web Browsers", of course, with a
section about dillo.
http://freshmeat.net/articles/lightweight-web-browsers
22-Mar-2002
Damien Gallop at MacWrite.com has mentioned Dillo in his review of browsers
for the Mac OS X.
http://www.macwrite.com/critical-mass/mac-os-x-internet-browsers
24-Jun-2002
Michael J. Jordan from Linux Online has made a review of various Linux web
browsers out there. In the article there is a nice and small mention of Dillo.
http://www.linux.org/apps/reviews/browsers0602_6.html
01-Feb-2002
The people over at www.ntk.net have written a little blurt about Dillo. Short
review from H4ck3r's perspective. It's notably how they had been the only ones
able to make a point of dillo's networking performance (not only rendering).
That's soothing to me, since I've worked very hard on it (two papers and
presentations at the SCCC 2000, that were not understood at all! :-)
http://www.ntk.net/2002/02/01/#TRACKING
|
